Skip to main content

Apple - Spotify Competition About To Get Messy

Apple Music has Spotify firmly in its sights. It's one of the few areas where Apple isn't number one and the company invested $3bn in Beats to ensure that it is. Streaming is the future and Apple is determined to put Spotify in its place.
Spotify hasn't got where it is without being a fighter and yesterday the company landed the next blow in its battle to retain its position, attacking Apple's App Store based revenue stream. Specifically the fee that Apple charges for in-app purchases of subscriptions.
For those who don't know, buying anything in-app on your iOS device means handing over a 30% fee to Apple. For developers who publish apps with app related purchase options - the freemium model which has proved so popular - that seems like an entirely reasonable thing to do. For publishers who charge a subscription for a service delivered which has nothing to do with the App Store its just outrageous.
Spotify has dealt with this by loading the Apple tax onto the customer. So a $9.99 Spotify subscription costs $12.99 if bought on your iPhone. Yesterday Spotify contacted all of its customers who are paying this rate and told them how to cancel their higher priced subscription and re-sign for the cheaper option on Spotify's website.
Seems entirely reasonable. However Apple's T&Cs would seem to prohibit this kind of behaviour - advertising rates which are cheaper than the App Store rate is specifically banned. Apple could throw Spotify's app out of the store in retaliation. Spotify would need to re-submit an app without the option to buy a subscription to regain its place.
To me it all looks very anti-competitive and whereas regulators seems to have allowed Apple to take liberties with its App Store policies in the past, this time I suspect that any action taken against Spotify might well result in action. Particularly in the EU, where Spotify is headquartered.
The fact that Apple and Spotify are now in direct competition only complicates matters.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…