Skip to main content

Apple Results Give Clue To Apple Watch Sales

 
How well is the Apple Watch really doing?
 
I've covered this before, however detail from Apple's financial call yesterday allows some educated guesses at numbers and performance.
 
First of all Apple has claimed that it isn't breaking out sales numbers because it doesn't want to provide competitors with information which may help them. I'll call BS on that straight away. Apple has never been shy about numbers when they have been good. Which means that the numbers for Apple Watch haven't been what Apple hoped for. Also Apple's claim that it's just catching up with demand is a bit smelly too, given that you've been able to walk in and buy one in store for a while and the market is being expanded to low volume countries like New Zealand next week.
 
Lumping the Watch sales in with all of Apple's other orphan children (like the iPod) doesn't strike me as a particularly positive move either. However if we take some educated guesses around trends and changes, compare 'Other' sales to past quarters and stick a finger in the air, I'm guessing the Apple Watch was a $1-1.5bn business for Apple last quarter.
 
What about an ARPU for the Watch? Well the cheapest Watch is $349, with the mid-ranger $549. I think we can safely ignore the Edition for volume calculations. Splitting that volume 50-50, 75-25 and 25-75 gives total sales between two and two and a half million at the low end and three to three and a half million at the high end. That's right on the money for the ten million I predicted here.
 
That doesn't strike me as a failure by anyone's measure except Apple's own expectations. For a version one product with obvious and well-documented flaws that's a remarkable achievement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…