Skip to main content

Wireless Charging Down To Two Alliances, Apple Holds The Key

 
The wireless charging battle is heading towards a common standard, following the merger of two of the three consortiums offering wire free charging technology. A4WP and PMA announced a merger yesterday which leaves them competing with the WPC and its Qi charging technology.

With Qi providing the technology behind just about every phone with wireless charging it seems the new alliance will have its work cut out to win the market over, but maybe it doesn't have to.

Apple has not yet offered an iPhone with wireless charging embedded. Whether that's because the technology requires some compromises in battery performance and device design isn't known. However the truth is that whichever alliance manages to secure the sale of their technology to Apple becomes the de facto standard and kills the other.

Whilst Samsung has included both PMA and Qi charging in the Galaxy S6 its unlikely to be a widely adopted solution to the problem. Samsung's decision was in part driven by their membership of the PMA but their support of Qi proves the strength of the latter's adoption in the market. Unless that adoption of both standards comes in at a cost of zero to OEMs they won't play ball.

The Apple Watch may well give us a hint of the way that Apple is leaning though. It includes the Qi standard for its wireless charger. Whether that means that Apple will follow this path for the iPhone remains to be seen.

When Apple does decide to pick sides in this battle which should see a huge increase in the number of wireless charging points, from restaurant tables to car dashboards and even in furniture, as Ikea has started doing with some of its flat back offerings.

Whilst it would be nice to hear something at WWDC, or even at the iPhone 6S launch in the Autumn, my gut feeling is that Apple is still not ready to embed wireless into its biggest earning device, which means we'll be waiting a while longer for the wireless revolution to happen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…