Skip to main content

Tim Cook Burns Ad Based Businesses In Google Attack

Tim Cook delivered a fairly harsh assessment of businesses which derive profits from mining your data for advertising purposes. At the EPIC awards ceremony in Washington Apple's CEO went big on the dangers of allowing businesses to learn about you from your online data.

It's an interesting strategy, positioning Apple as a safe harbour for your information, financial, health and personal. However I'm not convinced that Cook has valid points once you take out the business led reasons for his attack.

Apple's income stream is based on the sales of hardware devices, specifically the iPhone. It has been the absolute star of Apple's business since launch in 2007, but in recent years has come to be such a big earner that it drives Apple's whole business strategy, not to mention its share price. The iPad looked like it may split that burden for a while, the Apple Watch might just do, but only because it's an iPhone accessory.

Google and its partners are able to offer some compelling devices and have logically hurt Apple's sales (that is iPhone sales would be higher without competition from high end Android phones) Cook hasn't really had a good weapon to use against them, however now the the iPhone 6 has addressed the weakness of the iPhone range by giving more customers what they want he's able to go on a full frontal assault against the Search giant.

Make no mistake, Cook has no interest in what companies like Twitter and Facebook do with your data (they wouldn't be so well tied into iOS if that were the case) they are just collateral damage in his war with Google. Cook wants (and is legally obligated to attempt) to take the whole premium smartphone pie. Google and Android stand in his way. Attacks on the OEMs only gives them credibility (see past history with Samsung) and attacks on their devices costs Apple credibility. Google is his only target and the perceived invasion of privacy is the weakness he is seeking to exploit.

Interesting to note how Cook and Apple's campaign has been received in a different manner to Microsoft's Scroogled campaign, which sought to deliver the same message.

Aside from that, is Google's privacy invasion really that much of an issue? I'm not convinced. If Google's algorithmic searches through my email, messages and images means that I get ads that better reflect the things that I might be interested in that's all good. Do better ads impact the privacy of my data? Not at all. Does Google's business model concern me? No.

The trade-off that Google offers amounts to free storage, tools and even operating systems in exchange for the right to create targeted ads. If you're the sort of person unable to deal with that relationship you should definitely shut down your Google accounts. For most people I think that will turn out to be a fair trade.

Whatever Apple tells you.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…