Skip to main content

Your Next Smartphone Will Be Less Flexible

Android smartphones have always had one major hardware advantage over the iPhone: flexibility. Flexibility to add move storage, swap out a depleted battery, even the ability to add functionality by changing the rear cover for a different one.

The poster child for this flexibility has always been Samsung, who have always pushed creative solutions to market. Up until the launch of the Galaxy S6 that is. With its new flagship phone Samsung has killed all of this functionality and done away with removable rear covers, micro SD card slots and replaceable batteries.

Why? Because it allows them to stuff their bottom line profit.

The micro SD card allowed customers to buy the cheapest phone in a range and upgrade it with memory cards as required. The natural motion of memory card prices being down, it meant that a customer could upgrade their phone at little expense.

Apple clearly saw this as a risk to its bottom line before it gut the iPhone anywhere near market. It did away with card slots and offered larger capacity devices at greatly enhanced profit levels. Eight years down the line it is still benefiting from this decision.

Samsung clearly caught on to the potential boost to its profits if the newly designed S6 lacked a card slot, and in order to achieve this it despatched the removable cover and battery too. And of course Google's Nexus devices have eschewed expandable memory forever. As result other OEMs are likely to try and follow suit. HTC ditched the card slot from the One M7, although it returned with the One M8, whilst Xiaomi have been talking about ditching the card slot too.

Profits in the industry being what they are its hard to see other Android OEMs jumping on the bandwagon if Samsung is able to boost or maintain sales despite ditching the card slot.

How much is it worth to the OEMs? Well Samsung is charging an extra £50 for the 64 GB version of the S6 Edge, a good quality micro SD card retails for less than half of that. In six months time its probable you'll be paying less than that for a good 128 GB card. Adding an extra £30 profit to a device liable to sell upwards of five million devices a quarter will work for Samsung to the tune of £600 million a year.

It might not work quite so well for you.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.