Skip to main content

More Pebble Apps Facing App Store Disruption

Apple has categorically denied it has any issue with apps for the Pebble smartwatch being made available in the App Store, yet continued reports of developers having problems suggest Apple's policy and intentions might not be aligned.

When the first reports of Pebble compatible apps being turfed out of the App Store appeared, just before the Apple Watch went on sale, many people concluded this was a deliberate attempt by Apple to damage its biggest competitor. Apple wheeled out a spokeperson to deny this was the case and the apps started to roll back into the store.

The problems haven't gone away though, with ReadWrite reporting on the problems experienced by the developers of the Swim app for Pebble. Reading between the lines it appears Apple has doubled down on restrictions which prevent details of competitive products appearing in the app description. If you're launching an app for the Pebble, best not mention it anywhere in the description when submitting it to the Store.

Is this a form of paranoia at Apple, or just an underhanded way of damaging Pebble's business? After all if the company and third-parties who support the Pebble can't get their apps into the app store - or face additional hurdles to do so, it hurts customer's perception of them. Making them less likely to buy a Pebble.

The Apple Watch is good enough to not need this sort of business practice to succeed, so you have to wonder whether Apple's terms and conditions need third party scrutiny.

Then there is the question of how this will play out if Google seeks to deliver support for Android Wear on the iPhone. Some form of bloodbath in the offing there if you ask me.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…