Skip to main content

Microsoft, Do A Better Job Of Advertising Windows Phone

Building more market share by selling more and more cheaper smartphones is a strategy that can only work for Microsoft for so long. At some stage Windows Phone is going to have to start making money for the company and to do that Microsoft will need to start producing higher end and flagship phones that generate a buzz for themselves.

So how does the average customer view Microsoft's phones? Right now, in many markets I'd suggest that few even know they exist. Many of they sales that Microsoft are making still rely on the strength of the Nokia brand. Phones carrying that branding are disappearing though and making Microsoft a brand of phone which customers are interested in is going to take marketing spend and, more importantly, intelligence.

The company doesn't have a great track record with advertising its products - whether its the woeful Scroogled campaign, or the dancing Surface commercials, Microsoft just hasn't been able to judge the mood correctly.

This commercial comes from Microsoft's subsidiary in Spain and demonstrates that some regional operations are doing a better job. However even this commercial isn't great. Aside from the catchy soundtrack what does it tell you? The qualities of the Lumia 1520 it advertises don't get pushed at the potential buyer and the only takeaway is that you can pointlessly zoom in on text. Even the message that the presentation is streaming from the phone isn't completely clear at the end.

Compare this to Apple's ads, which demonstrate a clear use case, highlight exactly the features that Apple think will sell the phone and, usually, show some clever use of software on the device. The difference is night and day.

In  fact I would suggest that this commercial went further in boosting Future Islands profile than it did the Lumia 1520's.

It's about more than building great products, it's about creating a desire for them too. Microsoft haven't solved that yet.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…