Skip to main content

As AOL Dies Facebook Plans New Walled Garden

Once upon a time services like AOL and CompuServe were the Internet for most people. Locking customers into their own heavily curated networks they held sway over the online world. There was no access to websites, just 'rooms' within the service and you couldn't send email to just anyone, only those who were on the same service as you.

The arrival of services like Internet Service Providers (primarily Demon in the UK) eroded the power of these giants and led to the internet as we know it. The last vestige of those bad old days died yesterday when Verizon announced that it would be acquiring AOL. The company which once bought Time-Warner for $180 billion is being sold for $4.4 billion.

The ideas behind AOL and its walled gardens aren't dead though. In a neat bit of symmetry Facebook chose the same day to launch is Instant Articles service, serving news from selected content providers directly from within its Facebook News Feed. Its a further attempt to keep users in the Facebook app and keep their eyes on content which earns Facebook a revenue stream. It also seeks to control user's messaging, with its Messenger app. By making it easier to communicate with other Facebook users it seeks to help you on the service whilst using your own presence to draw your friends online too.

Its not just Facebook. Apple and Google would both like to tie you into their content and messaging platforms to the exclusion of the wider internet. Apps which serve as clients to what would be browser content on the desktop are heavily promoted on the basis that apps need Google or Apple's ad platforms to monetise, whereas mobile websites can choose any ad platform.

Ultimately it will be the users who decide what the future of mobile looks like. Do we want an open standards based mobile internet, where everyone is included, or do we choose to jump from walled garden to walled garden interacting only with those aside the garden?

More than two decades from the rise and fall of AOL are we sleepwalking back into that kind of world again?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…