Skip to main content

Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge Quick Look

I had a chance to spend some time with both of the new Galaxy S6 models today and my first thoughts were that it's a totally underwhelming device.

The standard S6 looks, from the front at least, like an S5. When you pick it up it has the cold hard feel of an Apple or HTC product, but the design doesn't flow as well as either of the competitors. In fact up against the HTC One M9 or Sony Xperia Z3 I find very little that's appealing about Samsung's new design language.

When turned on the S6 is little better. Side by side with the HTC or Sony you can barely tell that there are twice as many pixels on screen. The display is very nice, but alongside the S5 it doesn't represent a massive step forward.

This change in design has cost two of my favourite Samsung features - the replaceable battery and the memory card slot. Dual wireless charging circuits don't feel like a huge compensation. In use the S6 feels just like the S5, there's been no magic pill that suddenly makes TouchWiz work any differently. It is what it is. If you can't live with TouchWiz this isn't the phone for you. If you've previously owned an S5 you'll have no problems adapting.

The S6 Edge is a completely different kettle of fish. For some reason the screen here looks a million times better than the standard phone. The image looks like it's painted onto the glass, whilst the curves of the screen edges are aesthetically very pleasing. Functional? Not in the slightest, but I don't believe that's why they're there.

Of the two phones, one clearly has a reason for existing. The S6 Edge is a beautiful piece of kit, it's screen and curves more than justifying the compromises that Samsung made to get it here. It is a joy to hold and use. The S6 however feels like something Samsung whipped up when it realised that its new screen technology wasn't going to yield enough units to maintain its sales numbers. It may as well have stuffed the new innards into an S5 and offered that instead. At least customers would have had the choice of function against form.

For Android customers the S6 Edge is the phone to have. If it is in stock and you can afford the premium that Samsung is asking then this is without question the Android phone to buy. If you can't run to the Edge then the S6 is a poor substitute. I'd recommend the Xperia Z3 as the better phone, at least you will have a card slot and waterproofing even if you don't have the beautiful curved screen.

If you must stay with Samsung then the Note 4 is probably a better choice than the S6, a bigger screen and replaceable battery and a card slot all weigh in its favour.



Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…