Skip to main content

Dear Alfa Romeo, Please Give Us A Slower 4C

The Alfa Romeo 4C is a phenomenal achievement, weighing less than 900kg and packing more than 230bhp, it's an Alfa Romeo that mixes it with Porsche and Lotus.

But is this the best version of the 4C Alfa Romeo could give us?

I'd really like to see Alfa Romeo swap out the 1800cc turbo charged engine from the Giulietta QV for the smaller 1400cc 170bhp engine from the standard Giulietta, or, even better, a normally aspirated version of the 1800cc engine producing around 145bhp (a figure the inline four cylinder has produced in previous Alfas).

Why would I want a slower 4C?

Firstly because it would provide more accessible fun. As it stands the 4C is only a driver's car at dangerously high speeds. It's an accusation that could be aimed at pretty much any car with sporting pretensions on the market today. Reducing the amount of horsepower, lowering the weight and as a result requiring less aggressive tyre and suspension setups would make it a much better car to use on public roads. Economy would improve as a side benefit.

Secondly it would reduce the price. The Giulietta is £10,000 cheaper with the smaller engine. Passing that saving on would make the 4C an option for more buyers. Alternatively if increasing production is impossible, passing on a part of that saving would improve Alfa's profit per car.

Whilst others chase glory by putting insane amounts of power into their cars (impressing nobody but the rock apes who will undoubtedly lack the skill to unlock their capabilities) Alfa Romeo should be ploughing a different path.

The 4C is one of the few pure driver's cars on the market today. Conversely by offering a slower version Alfa Romeo could make it even better.



Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…