Skip to main content

Apple's Caution On Watch Faces Is Warranted

Apple has changed its app submission guidelines to specifically ban watch faces from the App Store. It isn't a completely unexpected move given that no hint of this functionality was offered in any of the pre-launch presentations, however its extension to include apps whose primary purpose is to tell the the time has had some developers up in arms.

There are very good reasons for Apple controlling the watch faces that appear on the Watch. Firstly from a litigation point of view they do not need the headache of policing claims and counter claims from real world watch manufacturers that their trade dress rights have been infringed. We've seen this happening in Google's Android Wear store and the results are messy. With Apple's firm stand on protecting design it would be remiss of the company to do anything less.

There's a second reason though. The Watch app store is a new property for Apple and the Watch a new device. Its success is, in part, dependent upon third party software supporting the Watch and supporting it well. Drowning useful software in a glut of watch faces doesn't send out the right message to consumers. Of course seeing somebody with an ill-conceived or badly implemented watch face on their Watch could also damage the reputation of the Watch with consumers.

I don't think this will necessarily be a long-term ban on watch faces. However I believe that Apple has a plan to extract more revenue for the platform by offering additional Watch faces through a separate store or sub-division of the store. With rights holders able to create their own Watch face and sell it at a fixed price. Imagine a band, car maker, sports team or film producer releasing a branded watch face for that product /  team / artist, available for download at $1.99 say? The take up would be enormous.

Watch faces could dominate Apple's Watch income the same way that Nokia's XpressOn covers did with dumb phones a decade ago. I believe that's the real reason why Apple is keeping the Watch face its own right now.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…