Skip to main content

Adonit Jot Touch: A Poor Effort At A Stylus

One of the areas where the iPad really struggles to compete with other tablets is as a note taking device. Android devotees can choose from two sizes of Galaxy Note tablet, both of which work brilliantly well. Windows advocates on the other hand have a wider selection of manufacturers and technologies, with different active pen support at all pricing levels.

For the iPad it's been the capacitive stylus or nothing. Writing with a sausage hardly matches up to the full active tablet experience, even if iPad software developers have managed to bring the best tools to the game.

There has been a recent attempt to move note taking on the iPad forward, using powered stylii that leverage Bluetooth 4 LE and fine point tips to improve the writing experience. The Adonit Jot Touch With PixelPoint is one such device.

I came to the Jot Touch with high hopes. This seemed like the ideal tool for note takers, bringing the iPad's software together with a writing tool worthy of the name. That illusion was swiftly shattered.

The Jot Touch with PixelPoint works with selected pieces of software that have implemented the software tools to utilise its key features, to whit: palm rejection, pressure sensitivity, button control and precision.

Even for the best of those applications that I tried the Jot Touch's performance was terrible.

I tried the following apps: Adonit's own Forge app, Penultimate from Evernote, GoodNotes and Smart Note. All but Smart Note are recommended on Adonit's site. Performance in all is nothing short of terrible.

I found palm rejection to perform woefully in each application. In Penultimate I found a huge discrepancy between the stylus tip position and the on screen representation of the position, and in all applications the Jot Touch failed to register between 10% and 20% of all pen strokes. Even Adonit's own Forge app struggled with the relationship between stylus and page.

In fact I found that I could achieve almost identical performance from the Jot Touch when used in Bamboo Paper and OneNote. That is to say that the stylus performed as a standard sausage stylus without any of the functional enhancements offered. As these apps are unsupported that's not surprising. The truth is that it demonstrates no real value in the recommended software or the features claimed for the stylus.

For note takers the Jot Touch is an expensive waste of money. Delivering none of the claimed precision or palm rejection. For this reason I highly recommend that you avoid this stylus, at least until Adonit and/or the app developers deliver a much improved package.

A very disappointing product.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…