Skip to main content

Adonit Jot Pro v Bamboo Stylus - updated

If you want to do anything other than basic note taking or finger painting on the iPad the. You're going to need a stylus of some sort. Having already discovered that Adonit's Jot Touch with PixelPoint, Bluetooth LE stylus seriously over promised and under delivered in accuracy, Palm rejection and speed it will be interesting to see how it's capacitive stylus fairs up against Wacom's Bamboo Stylus.
The latter has been available for a couple of years now and doesn't vary greatly in technology from the standard, rubber tipped stylii that you can pick up for next to nothing just about anywhere. However it does have some features which make it worth the extra money over those giveaway stylii.
Firstly the Bamboo has a thinner tip - around 25% narrower than that of a standard rubber tipped stylus. The rubber of the tip is of a different material than its direct competition, being a little stiffer and running across the iPad screen in a way that evokes the feel of pen and paper quite well.
The Jot Pro is a completely different experience from the get go. Its tip is a flat, transparent, rubber disc, through which you can see a metallic circle which forms the writing surface of the stylus. The metal part of the tip is no different to a ball point pen in size and tied together with the transparent disc it means you can judge much better where your lines will appear when written. To protect the tip a screw on lid is provided which can be screwed onto the end of the stylus when in use.
For carrying purposes the two stylii are about the same size and length, although the Jot Pro is a longer pen when the lid has been moved to its 'in-use' position.
Jot Pro pattern demonstrates how inconsistent its input is.
Once you start using it the differences in performance become apparent. The Jot Pro seems to randomly skip input, lines have random gaps and words are missing letters or groups of letters. In place the input is completely useless. Adding more pressure when writing minimises this effect but doesn't stop it entirely.
Bamboo is clearly better, unlike the Jot, text is clearly legible.
The Bamboo on the other hand is perfectly consistent with its input, lines are full and words complete. It is far superior to a cheap rubber tipped stylus thanks to its clever tip. It's also far superior to the Jot Pro.
For note taking purposes the Jot Pro just doesn't work for me. It's input is far too unreliable and despite its better precision losing large chunks of input certainly won't be appreciated when trying to capture information quickly.
The Bamboo Stylus is the clear winner here. It outperforms the Jot Pro, other rubber tipped stylii and even the Jot Touch - impressive for such an old product. In terms of value for money this is the right stylus to be using.

Update: Shortly after completing this review the Jot Pro stopped registering touches completely. It may be that the poor performance of the stylus was as a result of a component failure. I have subsequently used the Jot Pro 2.0, which appears to be much better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.