Skip to main content

AdBlock Plus Victory Threatens The Future Of Content On The Net


Content on the internet is generally free at the point of consumption. The content provider makes their resources available to browsers in exchange for viewing ads on the content pages. The content provider's business model is based on getting sufficient views and consequentially click through to provide it with the funds to keep operating.

Its a tenuous business model at best - we've seen some pretty big name sites disappear over the last year as the model fails to meet their funding requirements.

The alternative model is a paywall - locking up content (all or just some premium level stuff) behind a paid subscription or per access service. It has generally proven to be a limited success.

AdBlock Plus is a piece of software which prevents ads from displaying on websites. In doing so it damages the revenue stream for the publisher and makes it less likely that the website will be able to continue. 

In Germany (home of AdBlock Plus's owner Eyeo) several news sites challenged AdBlock Plus's legality in court. They lost. Which sets a precedent that could break the internet for everybody.

Major news sites cost an awful lot of money to run, those users who use AdBlock Plus to deny the publishers a revenue stream are effectively strangling the service that they use by cutting off the funds that would allow them to keep publishing news. Perhaps those users who install AdBlock Plus would never consider clicking on an advert, but by blocking those adverts from even showing they are impacting on the 'circulation' figures of those sites, which could reduce the ad display rates.

Worst of all, AdBlock Plus is a business that makes money out of damaging other legitimate businesses. For that reason I hope that the German court revises its decision under appeal. Otherwise those legitimate businesses will have to start employing tactics that ensure website ads get viewed - something that makes the web less friendly for everyone.

Updated to clarify that AdBlock Plus is the product which was involved in the German court case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…