Skip to main content

So How's The Swiss Watch Industry Looking Now?

As beautiful on the inside as the outside, something a watch packed with electronics could never be. 

Before the Apple Watch was announced Jony Ive was (in)famously quoted as suggesting the Swiss Watch Industry was dead in the water - although he was a lot more colloquial about it.

Given the impact that Apple has had on the phone industry - and Nokia and Finland in particular - there must have been some very real concerns in the quiet boardrooms of the Swiss cantons.

So, now that we know about the Watch versions, pricing and availability how are things looking for other watchmakers, Swiss or otherwise?

For the mid-price brands there are going to be some tough times ahead. Gucci, Swatch and Rado in particular seem likely to lose customers to Apple. Other brands like Hamilton, Tissot and TAG-Heuer might see some challenges at the lower end of their market, but frankly I'm struggling to see a customer who chooses between two such different products as the Apple Watch and, for example, the Hamilton Khaki, even if they sit in the same price bracket.

For the real boutique watch companies like IWC, Panerai and Patek Phillipe I see no cause for concern. Buyers of these sorts of watches buy many watches from many brands. At a guess I'd say that they might consider an Apple Watch as an addition to their collections, but actually probably not. Friends I know who are watch people see the beauty of the watchmaker's skill and the precision of the mechanisms they craft. I don't see that a combination of electronics and sensors, even if wrapped in a beautiful gold case, will appeal to them.

The Apple Watch will sell well, but not to buyers who buy timepieces for their inner beauty.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…