Skip to main content

Microsoft Surface 3 Looks Like A Pricing Miscue

Microsoft announced a new Surface today, replacing the previous ARM-based, Windows RT toting Surface 2 with the shiny new Surface 3, which riffs on the successful Surface Pro 3 in design and capability, at a reduced scale.

The Surface 3 packs the latest Intel Atom processor and a 4:3 10.8" screen. It supports the same Surface Pen as the SP3 and runs full fat Windows 8.1. Battery life is a reputed 10 hours. The fabulous kickstand of the SP3 has reverted to a three position stand though, which isn't great news.

Still, sounds mostly positive so far.

Until we get to the pricing and then it all goes a bit pear-shaped. The Surface 3 starts at just £419 for the 2GB/64GB combination, which sounds good on paper. Until you look at the big brother SP3, where the entry level version gets you an Intel Core i3 processor, 4GB of RAM, a bigger, higher resolution screen and the real deal in the kickstand, all for just £579. 

That's £160 well spent in my book.

Things get substantially worse if you compare the Surface 3 to the latest iPad Air 2, which starts at £399. That gets you about the same amount of storage as the Surface 3, and access to most of the same apps that the Surface will be used to run (email, internet, Office). It's almost half the weight of the Surface 3 and will deliver better battery life, a fingerprint sensor to free you from passwords and has better cameras, a better range of tablet specific software and a wider choice of third-party accessories.

Yes the Surface 3 can morph from tablet to PC, but the weak processor will prevent it running too many heavy desktop apps, and you'll need to fork out a painful £110 for the keyboard accessory.

Being a Microsoft product it's undoubtedly going to be well put together and it looks fabulous, but I can't help thinking that its natural price point is closer to £300 not £400. Unless you must-have the Surface Pen's functionality there are better value Atom hybrids out there.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…