Skip to main content

Amazon Springs The Cloud Trap: Unlimited Storage For $5

As the number of devices we use grows finding a simple, effective way of maintaining documents across all devices has become more and more important. The rise of cloud services in the last five years has been the answer to this problem, even if could services have proven to be less than reliable, not always secure and somewhat expensive at scale.

Whilst the first two problems are probably never going to be resolved completely, the third has been less of a challenge, if you're prepared to be flexible.

With so many providers offering free storage in attempt to persuade you to invest in more cloud space, it has always been possible to keep all your data in the cloud by being flexible. Flickr offers 1TB of space for photos, Microsoft and Google offer 15GB free each, Apple gives you 5GB and Box and Dropbox offer you up to 50GB if you time your sign-up right. That's without considering a number of smaller services who offer more to make up for their lack of name recognition, or OEMs who frequently offer a bundled storage freebie to tempt you to buy.

Be careful about what you put where and you'll never pay a cent for putting your files up in the cloud.

If that sounds like a lot of effort to save a few bucks Amazon might just have the answer for you. For $60 a year Amazon Cloud Drive now gets you unlimited storage. Its a great price that promises to change the way that clouds work forever. Install the Cloud Storage client on your PC or Android phone and you really are off and running. iOS users will only be able to backup photos and videos for now, no word on whether a full client is coming.

Free cloud storage is useful, but by reducing effort and increasing peace of mind, I'd say that Amazon has an offering that is easily worth the $60 it's asking for the service.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…