Skip to main content

Samsung Struggling For Smartphone Identity

Seems a strange thing to say about a company doing so well in the smartphone market, but between being squeezed by Chinese and Indian OEMs in the bargain basement market and Apple at the high end, Samsung are struggling to plot a course that maintains its incredible record of success into the future.

It's a stramge thing because wherever you look you'll see Samsung phones - one in three smartphones before the slump, one in four even now. And Samsung has a range of smartphones which really does fill every possible niche. The Galaxy S5 and now the Note 4 are as good as - if not better than - any other smartphone you can buy. It's mid-rangers offer every possible compromise based on hitting a price point. If you can point to a competitor's smartphone you'll find that Samsung almost certainly has an equivalent model in its range.

At the low end Samsung struggles, Android isn't amazing on low end hardware and Huawei and Micromax are starting to make devices as cheap and as good. Nokia too is seeing lots of success with its cheaper handsets too.

Samsung has plotted a new course with both the Galaxy Alpha and Note 4 - more metal for a more premium feel in the hand. Only problem is, I don't think that's what Samsung customers want. Yes,we hear time and time again that the iPhone has a better build quality from the same journalists. The problem is they're wrong, The build quality of Samsung's high end handsets is every bit as good as Apple's. They're really complaining about the choice of materials, but again they're wrong. Metal is a really dumb choice for a phone, it doesn't transmit radio signals well, it wears badly and it's susceptible to damage when dropped or bent. And of course just about every iPhone user puts their phone in a case. As do most HTC One owners.

Whilst there are some outliers (Sony's Xperias and the LG G3 for example) if you want a premium Android phone you're going to be choosing between the Galaxy S5 and Note 4. By trying to win over Apple customer's by changing the way their phones are made, Samsung are chasing a market that just isn't there. In the main Apple owners despise Samsung (check out any pro-Apple blog for a taste of how much) and are never  going to by from the Korean giant.

Samsung needs to concentrate on the things it does well, building the best Android smartphones at all price points, and building it's own platforms for monetising the devices it sells. That means pushing the Galaxy App Store, going global with its Milk music service and better deals with Amazon and others to get customers buying from it's devices. It has even shown what a good job it can do with its software add-ons (just look at how it has extended Android into the Note platform) and needs to carefully build on that foundation for its wider range.

At the moment Samsung is still making substantial profits - US$4bn is not to be sneezed at. The worrying year on year drops in revenue (-10%) and profitd (ca - 60%) don't make comfortable reading. It's all very well on trading on being the anti-Apple, but some time soon Samsung needs to show it's not afraid to take it's own path to success.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.