Skip to main content

First Thoughts On Windows 10

The Start Menu returns to the desktop
Windows 8.1 isn't a bad operating system, indeed it does a half decent job of merging a desktop operating system with a touch screen tablet focused interface. However Microsoft mis-judged the demand for touch screens on desktop class machines and as a result there been no end of negative publicity about the OS. In reality most users who spend the time to get to know the system - and get it configured correctly - find that it is a extremely powerful way of using hybrid and tablet systems, whilst being a small step forward over Windows 7.

Windows 10 looks to address that negativity by better addressing the balance between desktop and tablet. And to ensure that it gets as much feedback as possible on the changes it's planning, Microsoft has released a technical preview which can be installed by anyone with the technical know-how (and a spare, non-critical machine). For starters Windows 10 will be available for desktop/hybrid systems, but ARM builds will follow and the prospect of Continuim delivering a single experience and applications across phone, tablet and desktop.

For me that meant sacrificing my Ubuntu test machine - an Core i3 laptop with 4GB of RAM. And having installed Windows 10 and had a few days to see how it performs I have to say I'm pretty impressed. Even on quite aged hardware with no touchscreen performance is excellent. Installation was straightforward and relatively quick. Only problem was with the Synaptics Touchpad driver, which required a driver download from HP's website.

For a technical preview build stability has been excellent so far - but 72 hours isn't a fair test. If it's still as solid after two weeks of testing I'll be impressed. In the meantime I'll be looking at what the new system has to offer enterprise and consumer-level users and see if there are any roadblocks that need to be addressed before Windows 10 reaches production.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…