Skip to main content

F1: Bianchi's Accident Raises Questions

The accident which has left Jules Bianchi in a Japanese hospital in a critical condition has shocked a sport that had begun to forget how vulnerable its protagonists are. With care and time we hope that the amiable Frenchman is able to resume normal life, although for much of last night we were hoping for the best whilst fearing the worst. The accident was one of those things that just doesn't seem possible, however the sight of the Marussia wedged under the recovery tractor speaks of a violent impact.

By necessity there will be an investigation into the various events that led to the driver's injuries, but as always with these things, a chain of unrelated yet complementary events came together to place Bianchi at the wrong time and the wrong place.

The biggest question has to be, why was the removal vehicle outside of the safety barrier on a live track, on a wet day in rapidly fading daylight? I, like many others I'm sure, thought 'Safety Car' as soon as Sutil's Sauber had speared off the track. When the safety car was deployed it seemed like a late decision, particularly as we had seen the Sauber on the crane and apparently on its way to a position of safety. It was only after the race had been stopped did we learn that Bianchi's car had crashed into the track vehicle which had been recovering Sutil's car.

The incident was being covered under double waved yellows, however by backing off for the incident Bianchi may well have made it easier for the car to aquaplane off the circuit. At lower speed the cars generate less downforce, which means the contact patch between tyres and track were more likely to be defeated. With the amount of water running across the track Bianchi may well have slowed enough to cause the car to aquaplane, but not enough to have any hope of retrieving the situation. Evidence from Sutil's accident suggests that both drivers would have been passengers - the Sauber was already going backwards when it arrived at Dunlop corner, scene of the accident.

Like Senna's accident twenty years ago, there was a precedent which if read rightly could have prevented this tragedy. In 1994, at almost the same point on a wet Suzuka circuit, Martin Brundle's Mclaren crashed into a group of marshalls recovering Gianni Morbidelli's Footwork. The Mclaren narrowly missed the recovery vehicle and ploughed into the marshalls seriously injuring one. Bianchi's accident was almost carbon copy.

F1 will pick itself up and race on at Sochi next weekend - it always has done - and whilst there is no sense in throwing around blame, in hindsight I suspect race director Charlie Whiting will agree that a safety car should have been deployed.

A long time ago - 1984 in fact - after being mauled for stopping the wet Monaco Grand Prix too early and depriving a young Ayrton Senna of an unlikely victory, clerk of the course Jacky Ickx was noted as commenting that he 'would rather have stopped the race one lap too early, than one lap too late'. Sentiments that feel entirely appropriate today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.