Skip to main content

Samsung Galaxy Note Edge: Brilliant, Bizarre, Or Maybe Both

That strip of curved display can be used for icons, notifications and specially
written applications, but is it anything more than a gimmick?
Along with the announcement of the Note 4, Samsung's real flagship device, the Korean company gave first sight of its curved screen technology in a real product by announcing the Galaxy Note Edge.

Spec for spec this is a Note 4 in all but one key feature, rather than stopping when it reaches the right hand side of the phone the Note Edge's screen curves around to form the side of the phone as well. This curved screen is then treated as an autonomous display for Samsung's TouchWiz interface, allowing it to be used for notifications, scrolling tickers, as a clock or even to run dedicated applications.

It's sounds of dubious merit, until you see it in action and then it looks great. Especially if developers get behind the idea and start pushing out applications dedicated to used that small strip of screen space.

Realistically though, as a way of showing off an extremely curved AMOLED screen it's a brilliant technology demonstration that doesn't really add anything to the Android experience. Given the quad-HD nature of the screen on the Note 4 the same functionality could have been quite easily provided by dedicating a thin strip of pixels down the side of the right hand side of the flat panel. Perhaps the curve will make swiping between the panels for the rounded portion of the display easier, but in all the demo videos I've seen so far users swiping from left to right have triggered the main screen panel change at least once.

I think the jury will stay out on the Note Edge until such time as we see more applications that can support the display - and at least one that makes a case for such a technical leap.

Until then, nice use of technology Samsung, but you've not yet made a case for it.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…