Skip to main content

Mophie Battery For Galaxy S5 Seems Doomed To Fail

That's a lot of added height just to save carrying
an extra battery with you.
This is the new Mophie Juice battery pack for the Samsung Galaxy S5. Modeled along the same lines as the iPhone version the premise is simple, put your GS5 into the battery jacket and enjoy a significantly improved battery life.

There are just two problems.

Firstly, the GS5 has epic battery life already - an easy day and a half to two days without any power saving shenanigans - and as we've seen from Samsung's clever advertising, in a pinch you can stretch out that longevity to three, four or even five days without too much trouble. There just doesn't seem to be a great number of people for whom this won't be enough to form a large enough market for Mophie.

Secondly, and more terminally for the Mophie product, the GS5 has a replaceable battery. And Samsung sell a very nice second battery kit for the GS5, which adds the second battery, a very nice charging dock and a carry case to keep the battery in when you're toting it around. That battery and case are tiny and weigh next to nothing.

In comparison, when the Mophie battery pack is installed on the GS5 it looks like the bastard child of
But it's the depth that really suffers.
a GS5 and a not so small pachyderm. It's big, thick and quite heavy. And did I mention it looks awful. The only compensation being that you can charge the GS5 and the Mophie through a single power source.

The Mophie has been a success for the iPhone because of the limitations of Apple's devices. To wit, sketchy battery life and a non-removable battery.

As the GS5 suffers from neither of these problems Mophie's solution seems somewhat superfluous to me. Especially when, at US$99.95 it costs more than twice as much as Samsung's official (and far superior) extra battery kit.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…