Skip to main content

Is There On Device Competition For Cloud Services

There are currently three competing smartphone platforms, three tablet platforms and three desktop platforms. Google, Microsoft and Apple are involved in a similarly epic battle for ecosystems, and the way that they are approaching that battle is different in interesting ways.

Google's Android is the biggest player if you consider devices as a whole, irrespective of their use case. Within Android there are a subset of devices that don't use Google's Mobile Services, but most do. Having Gmail, the Play Music, Film and Book stores; Google Drive and Hangouts installed across such a wide number of devices should drive significant business Google's way.

As I discussed yesterday, there's competition on device from the OEMs, Samsung and Sony for example, push their own services; and a large number of Android devices are bought in the lower end of the market without any likelihood of further revenue being generated for Google. As a result Google actively pushes its services on iOS, where we know that more affluent and bigger spenders tend to migrate. It almost completely ignores Microsoft's platforms.

Apple may have a smaller section of the overall market, yet it tends to keep its ecosystem largely exclusive to Apple devices. You won't find any Apple applications in the Play Store or Windows Market, although it does publish some tools for Windows desktop - iTunes and Bonjour for example. Its iCloud service is also accessible across the board thanks to its web service. Apple clearly looks to build a premium experience that it then reserves for its own customers. The tools that it publishes for the desktop are a pragmatic response to the market penetration of Windows and the need to give its device owning customers a way of connecting their devices to their PCs.

Microsoft has a slightly larger market presence than Apple, if you consider all machines sold with versions of Windows, but in the hot market segment - mobile - it does very poorly. As a result Microsoft pushes its services heavily to both Android and Apple users. It has some key tools that should help adoption of these services - Skype,  and Office - and does seem to be making some headway, particularly since the introduction of Office for iPad.

This strategy can only work for Microsoft if users are prepared to look further than the default options on their devices. They are battling the inertia which sees users accepting the default options on their phone - Drive, G+ and Hangouts for Android, iCloud and iMessage for iOS. 

But Microsoft does have one advantage when cloud services and ecosystems are compared - Microsoft's tools are universally available - there is no mainstream platform (and few smaller ones) that don't have access to Microsoft's services. If you're a user who doesn't like to be tied into a relationship which prevents you changing platform then Microsoft's services are really the most sensible place to be. 

In reality though, most users aren't interested. They will use what's on their device by default unless they already have a reason to change. 

Given that Microsoft has set its stall out to be the cloud first, mobile first company that isn't a great piece of news. 

It needs to figure out how it gets users to covet it services if it's going to make this strategy work. 


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…