Skip to main content

Having A Dead Battery Halfway Through The Day Sucks

My iPhone 5 got me today. Having convinced myself that its battery woes had been resolved (and it was safe to go with my iPhone for a full day away from the mains on a school holiday day out with my daughter), I found myself staring at a charge-deficient brick at 2.30pm. At least three hours away from getting to a charger I was left completely out of contact. As any parent will tell you, that's not acceptable in the modern day.

So why did I end up without power so early in the day? It wasn't like I was pushing the phone excessively. The sum total of the days activities was two minutes of video, forty photographs, eight minutes of calls, a couple of dozen SMS and fifteen minutes of web browsing on 4G.

In normal circumstances I wouldn't have headed off with my iPhone without putting a Lightning cable in my glove box - but recent tweaks to improve battery life (detailed here) had lulled me into a false sense of security. And of course my regular daily driver - the Xperia Z1 - easily powers through even the busiest day so I never have to worry about topping off the battery during the day.

With such little usage and a combined usage/standby time of just six hours from coming off charge to going black, I'm guessing I was undone by the iPhone's achilles heel, dreadful power management in low reception areas. One of the locations I visited was an aquarium, with lots of tunnels through tanks, and as we know water does a good job of blocking cellular radio transmission.

Being out of contact was an unpleasant experience. Having been a cellphone user for over twenty years I've known this experience before, but in the last five or six years on-demand connectivity has become such a key part of our daily lives that to be robbed of it almost distressing.

As iOS 8 offers no extreme battery saving mode (unlike Sony, Samsung, HTC and LG) the risk of this happening again would certainly be enough to prevent me choosing an iPhone again.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…