Skip to main content

F1: Three Teams On Death Row

Third cars weren't always unusual, here's Jonathan Palmer
in a third Williams at Brand Hatch in 1983
As if things on track at Monza weren't exciting enough, the sport now has to deal with strong rumours that the failure of three teams to make it to the grid next year will bring into play the three car team rule.

The three teams on the way out are likely to be Caterham (and the resignation of Christijan Albers as team principle has certainly added weight to that rumour following team owner Tony Fernandes bailing out earlier this year), Marussia (given the funding driven debacle at Spa that saw Chilton out of the car and then back in again) and Sauber (whose loss of ninth place in the championship may prove to be the final straw for the team). The future of the Lotus team doesn't look particularly bright either, especially after a deal to buy Mercedes engines for next season fell through, allegedly as a result of a failure to pay the agreed deposit,

The agreement between teams and the sports promoter (AKA Bernie Ecclestone) demands that if the number of entrants drops below twenty that each team will enter a third car.  As it stands we're guaranteed to see Ferrari, Mercedes, Mclaren, Toro Rosso and Red Bull in the sport next year. It's likely that Williams and Force India will also make it to the grid. With three cars each that's a 21 car field. If the Haas team makes it to its first race and assuming that Lotus survive we would be looking at a twenty-seven car field - the largest for a number of years.

The entry of a third car offers some intriguing driver possibilities too. Who would be first choice for the lucrative third seat at Mercedes? Or the increasingly competitive Williams seat? Could Kamui Kobayashi end of in a Mclaren-Honda next year?

Despite the sport's real need to retain the flavour offered by the midfield and back marker teams, the arrival of third cars for the teams at the front of the grid can only add to the excitement. Think that the Rosberg - Hamilton battle has been exciting this year? Imagine a three way in-team battle for 2015.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…