Skip to main content

F1: Pit Radio Rules Complex and Unnecessary

New guidance has been issued to F1 teams ahead of the Singapore Grand Prix which detail the extent of a clampdown on pit to driver radio communications. The effect of these changes will be to ban almost all performance related instructions.

The changes are being implemented under the Sporting Code Article 20.1 which states that the driver must 'drive the car alone and unaided'. As such the FIA is particularly seeking to ban information which assists the driver to tweak his driving style through particular corners or sectors, where they may be losing time to rivals.

Some are seeing this as a disadvantage for younger drivers entering the sport, although that seems something of a leap. Experienced drivers will have to learn how to race without these messages, younger drivers have nothing to un-learn, so there's likely to be little or no performance gain in either direction.

The use of pit communications to assist the driver in planning his defence or attack against another driver, to tweak his race line and touch points to gain some speed through a section would be something advantageous if it were being used by one driver only. Given that it's use is universal I can't see a solid reason for banning it.

And whilst the list of allowed and banned conversations is not exhaustive there remains the spectre of drivers receiving penalties for messages which the team believes to be allowable and the stewards deem outside of the regulations.

Rather than a useful tool we face the prospect of just seeing the radio being used for drivers complaining about each other. And that would be a shame.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…