Skip to main content

F1: Conspiracy Theories Abound After Rosberg's Monza Meltdown

Hamilton's poor start setup an intriguing battle
I wonder how Nico Rosberg is enjoying his race at the moment? He's been cast in the bad guy role by all and sundry (but especially the British press, which loves to hammer on a German, especially one battling against a Brit) and had a couple of rocky weekends to boot.

At Monza, having been apparently gifted the race after Lewis Hamilton's botched start from pole position, Rosberg gave the race away after twice making the same mistake into the first chicane, the second time handing the lead to his team-mate and championship rival.

Whilst there were whispers of Mercedes engineering the whole thing to pay Hamilton back for the Spa injustice I'm rather more inclined to think that the problems were a result of Nico having a poor setup and being in a less than ideal place mentally.

It appears that Rosberg's car was carrying rather more downforce than Hamilton's - at least from the comparison between their fastest speeds through the trap at the end of the start - finish straight. Or was it?

Given that Rosberg doesn't often make mistakes, two in one race suggests some unusual circumstances. Even though I'm cynical about the team engineering the change of position, I'm not convinced that the team wouldn't have reduced the power available to one driver in order to ensure the correct result. It would fit with Mercedes telling the world that Nico had been punished, explain the gaps between the two Mercedes for most of the weekend and also explain the usually reliable Rosberg's mistakes - braking later into the chicanes to try and minimise the damage the reduced power was causing.

And don't think that such a thing is without precedent.

In 1983, also at Monza, Riccardo Patrese's Brabham was probably sabotaged by his own team after he'd qualified over a second faster than team-mate Nelson Piquet, who was in a championship battle with the Ferraris of Arnoux and Tambay; and the Renault of Prost. Patrese said that he intended to drive for the win, however it impacted Piquet's title bid. Bernie Ecclestone, at the time a lowly team owner, almost certainly took action to ensure Patrese didn't finish. The BMW engine in Patrese's Brabham exploded after just two laps...

By my reckoning the Mercedes team and Nico Rosberg owe Hamilton another win to balance out the points deficit from Spa. It's unlikely to happen in Singapore, where the Mercedes are likely to come under intense pressure from Red Bull. However with the number of races remaining it's not out of the question for the team to 'bungle' a pitstop to allow Hamilton to pass Rosberg and take those points back without raising suspicions.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…