Skip to main content

Xiaomi Accused of Ripping Off iOS7

Hugo Barra, CEO of Xiaomi, has spent the last few weeks denying that his company is shamelessly copying Apple's iOS7. Unsurprisingly large sections of the media have been vocally disputing the point following the announcement of the latest version of the company's Android skin - MIUI v6. It's not surprising really, look at the screen shot on the left. Those icons? The look and feel? The whole things smacks of an iOS 7 ripoff.

Shame on you Xiaomi. Wait... what's that? Things aren't as they seem?

Apparently not. This is a screenshot of Xiaomi's MIUI v5 smartphone skin for Android - released in April 2013. And iOS7? That was announced at WWDC in June 2013.

So unless Xiaomi have a secret time machine it's unlikely they're ripping off Apple quite as shamelessly as we're being led to believe. Even so, there's enough iOS6 design cues in there to make it difficult for the Chinese company to claim it's design is in any way novel.

Barra's claims that Apple is an inspiration for the work they do sounds reasonable on this basis. After all, we've already seen how Apple borrows from the competition as much as it's borrowed from. A little of the same is going to be difficult to dispute on that basis.

That said, the close physical relationship between various Xiaomi devices and Apple's still looks a little too much like blatant copying. Having devices on the market that look enough like Apple's to fool onlookers can't hurt sales - especially when Xiaomi is selling it's devices at a cheaper (and therefore larger) market.

As a result of this visual similarity Xiaomi's sales are going through the roof - with volumes expected to top 70 million this year. With most of those sales happening in China, it's likely that Apple will have to live with any wrongs it feels are happening. Once Xiaomi decides to take it's products international things might just be a little different.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…