Skip to main content

Self Driving Cars - Why We Need To Hasten Their Arrival

Every time you get into your car you're taking an enormous leap of faith, trusting your life to every other road user that shares your road space during your journey. The more miles you drive the more people you put your trust in. It goes beyond the trust in their driving ability, concentration levels, regard of the law; and all those other things that regulate how we drive, but also encompasses the vehicle itself.

I love driving but I can also see that the most dangerous component in any car is the one that sits behind the steering wheel.

Which is why I'm looking forward to a future where cars are driven by computers and not people.

However, like any change it's going to be hard to drive through. (Pardon the pun). Whilst there are many manufacturers who are working on self-driving cars, ultimately someone is going to have to bring them together to create some standards and regulations around the what, where, who and how of self-driving cars.

The motor industry blossomed in the last century because of the consistency in the driving and ownership experiences. Technology companies have shown a complete inability to do the same thing. There are strong regulators within the EU and now is the time for them to step in and direct the industry before too much time and money are invested in competing incompatible standards.

Some of the things that need to be addressed right now relate to communications between self-driving cars, the road infrastructure and a central control point, (e.g. for charging and monitoring systems). There will also need to be some consideration of how different collision avoidance systems interplay with each other and also how those decisions are scored in terms of outcomes. Who is going to clear up the legal mess after a self-driving car swerves into the path of a HGV to avoid hitting a pedestrian who has stepped into the road?

These challenges are worth facing, because there are huge community benefits to taking the need to drive and (ideally) ownership of a vehicle out of the individual's responsibility and passing it to municipalities.

And when it comes time to begin large scale testing of self-driving vehicles one place stands out as the ideal test location: Central London.

With a congestion charging zone that could easily be remade as an exclusion zone for regular cars, excellent availability of charging points, plus extensive and available public transport services to manage the movement of people on mass, a small number of London Mayor-owned self-driving cars, replacing taxi services and private cars, could herald the arrival of a truly integrated public transport system.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.