Skip to main content

For Apple iPhone Success Is Not A Factor of Market Share

As we move towards this year's iPhone release and leaks appear to hint at what may or may not be announced there has been much talk of the new iPhone releasing a perfect storm of sales, derailing the Android bandwagon which took 85% of smartphone sales last quarter.

This won't be the case. Here's why.

As with any new iPhone there will be a massive uptick in sales in the quarter following its release. I have no doubt that we will see a record number of iPhone sales reported once the 6 has completed its (their?) first sales quarter. Whilst some of this will be related to upgrades and some new users coming into the iPhone fold, the major factor in each new release has been the increased number of iPhones available and the greater number of markets at launch.

In truth, the growth over the lifetime of the iPhone 6 will be an improvement over the 5S/C, but incremental rather than by magnitudes. The rate of iPhone growth has been slowing since 2010. That's to be expected as a market matures. In order to match the 20% growth of last year Apple needs to sell 51 million iPhones this quarter - which would be a record in any quarter, never mind the generally average Q4 reporting period.

iPhone Sales Figures by Apple FY
The reasons are simple and easily explained. Firstly the iPhone is a premium device and secondly the iPhone retains the same pricing model with each new release.

In the premium smartphone market Apple's market share is likely in the region of 75-95%. There aren't huge numbers of competing devices here that have anything like the sales to challenge Apple's. If you take the Galaxy S5 as premium then it probably all but consumes the market share left after Apple has had it's take.

The thing with premium phones is that they are expensive (outside of the US anyway, where subsidies flatten the price curve and the iPhone does disproportionally well) and as a result they aren't available to the greater part of the potential customer base. The iPhone owns the premium market and it's share of that market moves between very small limits.

At the current level of market maturity everyone who can afford a iPhone is buying one. Those who can't have to make do with an alternative cheaper device or buy second-hand. The potential increase in iPhone sales is only ever the 5-25% of the market it leaves on the table.

However because Apple maintains the iPhone pricing structure with each new release, the affects of inflation and salary growth mean that in real terms buying an iPhone gets less expensive with each new release. The size of the market is growing. In populous developing countries - China and India in particular - the increase in the percentage of people who can afford to buy an iPhone need only be tiny to create a significant number of new customers.

For Apple overall market share is not a concern. A 20% year on year increase in iPhone sales may sound weak - but only in the context of the remarkable period of growth experienced as the smartphone went from niche to mainstream.

iPhone year on year sales growth
Customers with money go for the iPhone. Developers chase the money and further increase the desirability of the iPhone. Apple maintains its margins and sales keep growing. And Android can suck up as much of the low end market as it wants.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…