Skip to main content

F1: Sixteen Year Old Gets Toro Rosso Race Seat!

Sixteen-year old Dutchman Max Verstappen will drive in F1 next year, replacing Jean-Eric Vergne at Red Bull's junior team Toro Rosso.

I've always been a strong advocate of the school of 'if you're fast enough, you're old enough' but this may be pushing the limits of what is reasonable. Despite having a lengthy career in Karting - starting at age seven - Verstappen had never even sat in a racing car prior to October 2013. Eighteen months from first getting into a racing car to being on the grid in F1? That seems like an extremely short learning curve. Yes, the Dutchman has a prodigious win rate, but would another couple of years in junior formula hurt? I think not.

F1 is chewing up these young drivers at a ridiculous rate. Verstappen will become the youngest driver to compete in F1 when he starts his first race at 17 years of age - two years younger than the previous youngest starter Jaime Alguersuari. The Spaniard lasted just three seasons before being discarded - despite a good run of results with the Toro Rosso team. Vergne, at 24 years of age seems unlikely to find another drive in F1, again after three years with the team.

It is no surprise that F1 is losing its sense of occasion and appeal. Compare the men who put their lives on the line in the name of speed from this photo from 1973 with the kids who make up too much of the current field. Centre front of the photo is the American George Follmer - who made his F1 debut at 39, the oldest ever F1 debutant. The faces in this picture speak volumes.

There used to be a requirement for drivers to earn a F1 Super-license by producing results at junior formula which proved capability and intelligence. Adding an element of success at multiple junior formulae seems like something that needs to be added right, if only to prevent the sport being filled with twenty-somethings whose career stalled far too early for them to show what they could really do.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…