Skip to main content

Blackberry Up For Sale - Who Are The Potential Buyers?

Blackberry's decline has reached a stage now where even its own board doesn't see a way out. Facing a Palm-like death spiral into oblivion (or into the arms of HP, which amounts to the same thing) Blackberry is now courting buyers. But who might be interested?

Of the platform owners Google, Apple and Microsoft have invested heavily in their own product, so it seems unlikely that the lure of Blackberry's enterprise software and handset messaging will draw them into the bidding, unless its for the purposes of shuttering the service.

HP should have had their hands burnt often enough now to stay away. Dell has enough problems of its own right now.

So who has the desire and funds to develop a new platform?

Lenovo has the funds and is delivering great smartphone growth at the moment. Does it need, or even want to take on the challenge? Would any Android OEM want to take it on, given the flexibility to deliver great products on Android? The only one with any kind of motivation is probably Samsung, which has shown the desire to develop its own OS in the past. Google's close relationship with Motorola may persuade the Korean giant to diversify its smartphone offerings onto a proven - if damaged platform.

What about outside of the current smartphone sphere? Well how about Yahoo? Marissa Meyer has shown that she's not afraid to spend the money to buy up services and Yahoo needs its own smartphone tablet platform if it really wants to compete with Google and Microsoft. It would be a make or break move, but one which gets Yahoo a solid fourth place in the smartphone market and the opportunity to start driving the brand into places where it doesn't have a great reach - mobiles and tablets.

Or what about Amazon. The Kindle has been a great success and there have long been rumours of a Kindle phone. Amazon has the scale and history of successful execution that suggests that it could use a Blackberry phone to disrupt the current duopoly.

So Samsung, Yahoo or Amazon. What do you think?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…