Skip to main content

HP Coming Back For Another Round of Smartphone Fail

As a mobile device company goes HP sucks.

Back in the pre-smartphone days of PDAs it spent a large amount of coin developing its Jornada line of handhelds, before deciding that they weren't up to the job and abandoned its customer base (with obsolete and unsupported devices) by buying Compaq and switching allegiance to its high flying iPaq line.

Within a few years HP had taken that premium brand and driven it into the ground, releasing less and less attractive devices with no market appeal and finally killing the line of handhelds altogether in 2009.

Not satisfied with having killed two product lines HP did it again, this time buying out ailing Palm in 2010, delivering a handful of meagre upgrades and then within days of launching its all new product line announced it was getting out of the hardware business and shutting the whole shooting match down.

Now the company's lining up for another attack at the market. In fact a senior executive claimed that being late into the market would be a virtue for the company. Well I suppose it can't be any worse than the strategies its already failed to deliver on.

So what OS would a new HP smartphone run? WebOS? After all HP did spend more than a billion dollars to acquire it. Probably not, as the OS has been open sourced and its technical resource spun off as Gram. Android? With the strength of Samsung, a resurgent Sony, lively HTC and the Chinese competing strongly, that doesn't seem a sensible path. There's always Windows Phone, although Nokia's strength there and low overall market penetration make that a less than likely choice,

No I'm pretty sure HP are hoping to revert back to their iPod deal with Apple from the mid-2000s and sell a version of the iPhone with HP branding - iPhone+HP perhaps. More of a sponsorship deal than a manufacturing deal. HP pays Apple a bounty for every iPhone shipped with a HP badge on the back. At the current rate of iPhone sales it'll take HP about the same amount of time to burn through its billion dollars as it did with Palm, only this time without all those messy acquisition and separation costs.

You heard it here first folks!


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…