Skip to main content

F1: Silverstone Tragi-comedy Results From Parochial Choices

Pirelli must be wondering why it ever put itself in the position of sole supplier to the F1 circus. In doing so it has exposed itself to ridicule and vitriol even though it has been delivering exactly the tyre formula asked of it.

Never was that more apparent than after Sunday's British Grand Prix. A succession of tyre failures left the Italian rubber company the fall guy for errors made all through the sport's governance.

And with all that metal reinforced tyre carcass flying around we were fortunate not to see a repeat of Felipe Massa's horrible 2009 accident, the extreme reactions of several drivers being the dividing line between serious injuries and the race passing off mostly without incident.

Pirelli has been asking for changes to the tyre formula for a while now. Since it became clear that, in acquiescing to the sports overlords demands for a tyre that degraded quicker than tyres former supplier Bridgestone delivered, Pirelli had actually delivered a product of questionable durability. Not something you want on a 200mph projectile surrounded by marshalls, fans and other drivers.

Pirelli's request to deliver more durable tyres was vetoed by three teams who, by virtue of their ability to run their tyres lightly were performing better relative to their opponents. Those three, Ferrari, Lotus and Force India, were guilty of putting their own sporting interests ahead of driver safety and the results at Silverstone could have been catastrophic.

The sport has now relented and as a result testing of the Pirelli tyres will occur at Silverstone this week, with a view to delivering a safe product for the German Grand Prix at the Nurburgring.

F1 is a dangerous sport. Putting those involved at additional risk that can be avoided is to be frowned upon. And whilst there can be no sporting penalty for the actions of the three teams responsible, it should also be true that some of the media ire being directed at Pirelli be redirected in their direction too.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…