Skip to main content

Microsoft Needs To Fix Its Messaging

Windows RT, Windows Phone and now Xbox One. What do they have in common? They've all been poorly received because Microsoft did a terrible job of getting the message out to its customers.

Today Microsoft backtracked on some of the innovation that it announced as part of the Xbox One launch. In doing so it answered the criticism of the media and Sony's PS4 launch digs. As a result Xbox One owners will actually get a worse experience and fewer features in order that Microsoft is able to respond to ill-informed or unjustified criticism.

Microsoft needs to look at how it presents these things much more closely in the future. The company needs to understand that its dealing with a largely hostile press and a social media arena where it is still seen as the man. By failing to anticipate the way that product launches are going to be torn apart looking for weaknesses in content and used to stick it to the man Microsoft just stores up trouble for itself.

So taking the Xbox One launch as an example, we have the media focus on two issues. Resale of games and the keep-alive internet connection. Microsoft had good reasons for implementing both of these and buyers would have enjoyed significant benefits as a result.

Firstly a system which removed some of the (large) profits of second hand game sales from retailers and shared them with publishers. Better profits for publishers means more games being produced. And there was no cost to the consumer for this. Secondly, any member of your family registered on your Xbox One would have been able to play any game installed on your Xbox One on any other Xbox One. No need for transporting disks. Ever again.

In fact it would have meant the end of disk swapping as all games would have been installed to your Xbox One and streamed to any other that you had logged into.

All that is now gone, at least for day one, to satisfy the chatterings of ill-informed trouble makers who likely had no intention of buying one anyway..

Had Microsoft considered its initial message better we would never have got to this point...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…