Skip to main content

How Apple Fudged Its Numbers in WWDC Keynote

In amongst the self congratulatory back slapping that Apple indulged in at WWDC yesterday were some numbers on OS X 10.8 and Windows 8 adoption.

Tim Cook proudly stated that Mac OS X 10.8 shipped 28 million copies last year. He showed a slide that suggested 35% of Mac users were on the latest version against 5% for Windows 8. Followed by another slide showing average growth over the last five years of 15% for the Mac market against 3% for PCs.

So Apple would appear to be going great guns in the PC market wouldn't you say?

Unfortunately it was the usual case of Apple's keynotes hiding the truth behind a web of carefully chosen numbers. Misinformation and hyperbole.

The real truth: Windows 8 has shipped over 100 million copies in a little over half the time on sale. Or an adoption rate of almost eight times that of OS X. Windows 8 adoption even outpaces that of hugely successful Windows 7. That 28 million number isn't looking so hot right now is it?

Same goes for the current version percentages and sales growth. A big percentage of a little number still doesn't amount to a whole hill of beans. Tim Cook stated that the total Mac installed user base was 72 million. Meaning Windows 8 is already more than a third bigger than the total Mac installed user base in just seven months on the market. And by Apple's own estimation that amounts to just 5% of PCs out there.

Tim Cook also claimed that Mac sales were up 100% over the last five years, against 18% for PCs. Interestingly that means that from the 70.6 million PCs sold in Q2 2008 (IDC) PC sales added 12.7 million. For the 2.28 million Apple reported in Q2 2008 they added 2.28 million. So if Tim Cook's figures are true, the PC sales increase alone was more than three times the whole Mac market.

As Tim Cook said "it isn't even close".

Lies, damn lies and Apple keynotes?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…