Skip to main content

Google Engineer Aiding Hackers.... Wait, What?

Something very bizarre going on here, but it appears that Google engineer Tavis Ormandy is publishing exploits and releasing details of code weaknesses in competing products (specifically Microsoft's, for now anyway) and he's doing it with the blessing of Google.

Business Insider has the full story here, but in brief it appears that Tavis has been upset by the speed at which Microsoft addresses weaknesses in its software and, rather than follow the white hacker ethics code, which would mean that companies would be given a 30-60 head start before the weakness was published in the wild, Tavis has reduced this timeline to seven days.

I'm struggling to see how this behaviour can be seen as anything but evil on Google and Tavis's part. Certainly it goes against the grain for a white hacker to effectively blackmail a company in this way. Google's employment and support in this very much brings into question the motives for doing this too.

Ultimately Microsoft is responsible for it weaknesses and failings and putting them right is an important part of Microsoft's system update services.

But with an installed use base and software catalogue the size of Microsoft's its unrealistic to expect everything to be totally watertight or for vulnerabilities to be addresses in seven scant days.

The actions of Google and Tavis Ormandy specifically hurt Microsoft's customers, many of whom are also Google's customers and won't be hugely appreciative of these sorts of actions.

If your bank account was wiped because of a Windows security failing you'll be rightly annoyed at Microsoft. If it was wiped because a Google engineer published an exploit which allowed any script kiddie to use an obscure weakness to empty your account I suspect that you'll reserve the largest part of your wrath for them.

All things considered not a particularly sensible move.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…