Skip to main content

Colour Changing In iOS 7 Hints At Something New

One thing that I'd missed in the big launch of iOS 7 was that the colour palette of the system remakes itself based on the wallpaper that you've selected. 

That's interesting in only the smallest of ways in itself but I think it is a good indication that a cheaper iPhone is coming and also of potential features of its design. 

As I've said before Apple's reduced profit margins suggest that the mix of its biggest profit maker (the iPhone) is weakening. People are buying cheaper iPhones - the 4 and 4S, which are both still pretty competitive devices. 

I believe that Apple will recognise this move into new market areas and deliver a cheaper iPhone to compete with mid range Android and Windows phones whilst making better margins than the older models. 

This is where the palette changing optimisation of iOS 7 gets interesting. 

The new cheaper iPhone is likely to be plastic and available in a range of colours - coding each device with the colour of its shell would allow iOS 7 to include that in its palette changing algorithms. 

But extend it further, why just lock the phone to a single colour. If Apple were to make the shell replaceable with different coloured shells they'd open up a whole new high revenue stream for themselves. Ensure that iOS only recognises Apple manufactured shells and it becomes a licence to print money. 

And extending that even further, how about a translucent shell which uses bleed from the screen backlighting solution to power a shell that changes colour to match the wallpaper and iOS palette?

The net result would be to pull a younger, more marketable demographic to the cheaper iPhone, allowing Apple to lock them in to iTunes, Apps and then future heavy investment in Apple's product lines. 

It's a lot to extrapolate from the presence of just a single feature on iOS 7, but I'd be disappointed if Apple's management hadn't at least considered travelling down that road. 


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…