Skip to main content

Chicago Sun Times Commits Cultural Suicide

Its easy to spot when a newspaper has used a photo grabbed with a smartphone by a Johnny on-the-spot photographer. Usually relating to high profile incidents where the sheer penetration of phones with cameras guarantees that someone will be filming or snapping away.

The photos are generally grainy, out of focus or otherwise sub-par. But that's okay, its the best photo available of the event and we accept the way that it looks in order to help visualise the events that have occurred.

As a day to day regular occurrence though its not acceptable. Snapshots aren't acceptable to illustrate the total content of a newspaper and snapshots taken with a smartphone even less so.

The problem is that every man and his dog suddenly believes that having a camera available all the time makes their shots the latest word in photographic excellence. They really aren't. If you don't believe me take a quick gander at the links in your twitter feed to see how quickly that illusion gets dispelled.

Unfortunately the good people at the Chicago Sun Times - a newspaper of which I know little (not living in Chicago, or indeed the US) has decided to make two fairly terrible decisions to compromise photo journalism for the benefit their bottom line.

The first, to fire all their photographers and ask journalists to illustrate their own stories.

The second to equip them with iPhones to do the job.

Frankly, I can only assume that that this move is intended to aid the sale of the newspaper rather than sales of newspapers.

Photography is a skill and unlikely to be one that journalists working for the title have been hiding away under a bushell. At the same time the iPhone isn't a terrible smartphone camera, but when the average photog packs tens of thousands of dollars worth of lenses and a professional DSLR camera body to attach them to, its going to be found wanting.

Added together this is going to end up being a huge mess.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…