Skip to main content

Why F1 is F-Wrong

Schumacher ran sixty qualifying laps
to win in Hungary 1998.
With today's tyres it would never have happened.
Last weekend' Spanish Grand Prix marked something of a low point for F1.

Instead of the fastest cars being driven flat out by the fastest drivers we were treated to a Sunday afternoon stroll punctuated by a ridiculous number of pit stops. 

It's racing Jim, but not as we know it. And tyres are to blame.

Lap times were slow enough to make GP2 cars look rapid but its time to call a halt to this madness. The fastest race lap was over five seconds slower than pole position. That's more than a lifetime in racing, historically the gap has never been so big. Even in the early eighties when teams ran true qualifying tyres and 1000bhp qualifying engines built to survive just a couple of laps.


Drivers aren't being pushed physically or mentally; and they aren't racing each other. Who defends their position when it means that their tyres get destroyed and an extra pit stop will be required?

For those new to the sport this all may look very exciting. But the artificial nature of the overtaking and the need to run the race whilst prioritising tyre wear mean that we aren't seeing victories being taken by the fastest car/driver combinations.

The days of racing that I remember best are those when a driver has given his all - think Schumacher running 60 consecutive qualifying laps in Hungary in 1998 to leapfrog the Mclarens after electing to make an extra pitstop.

On the basis of what's happening in qualifying the Mercedes and Red Bulls are the fastest cars, yet they are harder on their tyres. Which would be an equitable trade off in a season where the tyres didn't go off quicker than old milk outside on a hot summer's day. This year its crippling their performance.

In fact right now the best race strategy is to get into Q3 and not run, saving an extra set of tyres for the race. Then run as slow as you can for half the race and hope to make up the ground on your new sets of tyres in the second half.

I can't imagine its enjoyable to drive and its certainly not enjoyable to watch.

Pirelli need to change the tyres and give us back some semblance of racing. Just so we can see the fastest guy win for a change.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.