Skip to main content

PS4 Won't Be Subsidised. Translation? PS4 Won't Sell

Sony's CFO has suggested that the PS4 won't be subsidised heavily when it comes to market. That's an interesting position to take, remembering that Sony had to take massive hits on the PS3 when it first launched just to get some sales numbers racked up against the Wii and Xbox 360.

The PS4 is going to launch into an infinitely more competitive environment and at a time when consoles are much less relevant than when the PS3 arrived. Sales are still there to be had, but I seriously doubt that there are the numbers required to maintain three major platforms. And of the three encumbents its Sony that I see most at risk.

Ninendo has the youth and non-serious gamers market wrapped up and Microsoft have delivered a compelling reason to choose an Xbox over PS4 with the Kinect.

Sony needs to look at the success of the PS Vita to understand the future its gaming division faces.

The Vita is hand down the best serious mobile gaming platform produced. Its just that hardly anybody wants a serious mobile gaming platform anymore. The market has been carved up between Nintendo and smartphones. And as a result Vita sales are all but meaningless.

If Sony wants the PS4 to succeed it has to make some significant changes to the way it does business.

  • Heavily subsidise the upfront cost of buying the console, recover losses through add-on revenue generating subscriptions
  • Encourage smaller developers onto the platform, fund development of PS4 games if necessary
  • Encourage a home brew market, make development tools accessible to non-traditional developers
  • Tie in mobile and console gaming
Unfortunately for Sony, even if it gets all of this right there are no guarantees that the PS4 will succeed. On top of all of this it needs to find that must-have game that makes people choose PS4 over its competition. And that's something over which it has little control.

Certainly, Sony's plan to make the PS4 cheaper to build (and therefore to sell) is a good one, but that may not be enough to save it.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…