Skip to main content

F1: Mercedes and Pirelli Perform Secret Testing of Tyres

Despite the protests of those involved that all was above board, the news that Pirelli and Mercedes undertook three days of secret testing after the Spanish Grand Prix is very disturbing.

The laws of the sport do not allow in season testing by teams, however a loophole exists where Pirelli may request a team's assistance to develop tyres. The loophole is in itself senseless - Pirelli have historically maintained its own test car and driver for specifically this kind of thing.

Worse still, three days of testing for both Rosberg and Hamilton; in a car which has demonstrated phenomenal speed in qualifying and a total inability to keep tyres together during a race looks decidedly stupid at best, downright deceitful at worst.

I have no doubt that Pirelli's big concern here is keeping Mercedes happy -after all the company sells millions of cars, vans and trucks every year. Its also spending an indecent amount of money to win at F1 and at the moment is being held back by its problems with Pirellis tyres.

Understanding that, you can see how a veiled threat to keep Pirelli out of any future original equipment supplier agreements unless things improved would have them jumping around to keep the bosses in Stuttgart happy.

Machiavellian? Perhaps, but after nearly forty years of following F1 I'd say that its as good a theory as any. Unfortunately.

My question has to be: if it was all genuinely above board, why try to keep it a secret?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…