Skip to main content

Windows RT A Poor Fit For Tablets

Microsoft's Surface hasn't been the success that the company hoped for - and that in spite of a fairly hefty advertising campaign.

For customers Windows RT promises much and fails to deliver in the most comprehensive manner.

The promise of Windows on a tablet is that it will operate like Windows and run Windows programs. Windows RT doesn't do this and so the Surface is compromised. And if Microsoft can't make Windows RT a success why would other OEMs waste R&D and marketing dollars trying to do better? Its bad enough trying to sell one version of Windows 8 in the current climate, never mind two.

Microsoft made a fundamental mistake with the launch of Windows 8. It gave customers the impression that RT was 'Windows-lite' - designed to run on tablets but otherwise the full experience. This doesn't make any sense - especially when Windows Phone 8 was being developed alongside and, with a little bit of tweaking - could be made to work quite well with the medium resolution screens that characterise Windows RT tablets.

The benefit would have been twofold - developers would have had a much larger customer base to develop for and consumers buying Surface-like products would have found a much greater choice of applications available to them on day one.

In fact had Microsoft set the minimum resolution of RT in landscape mode at 1280 x 800 pixels users would have been able to multitask three Windows Phone applications across the screen - a huge selling point when up against the iPad and Android tablets. Even better, imagine a live hand-off between those apps on the phone and tablet, moving from one to the other seamlessly.

This could have been the killer feature that boosted both Windows Phone and tablet sales. Instead it was a missed opportunity.

Microsoft are rumoured to be extending the range of screen resolutions supported by Windows Phone to allow its partners to move into the Phablet space. Perhaps this would be a good time to rethink the Surface and Windows RT too...


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…