Skip to main content

Windows Phone 7.8 Crashes Heavily, Further Burns Abandoned Owners

After a bit of a delay caused by shipping my possessions halfway around the world, I finally got the chance to try Windows Phone 7.8 on my Lumia 800. This has allowed me to prove the veracity of the many complaints being made about the upgrade.

Windows Phone 7.8 only exists to placate Windows Phone 7 owners orphaned by the announcement of Windows Phone 8. That it manages to be both disappointing and unreliable just adds to the pain. Microsoft have made a real error of judgement with this one.

Whilst Microsoft suggested that WP7.8 would bring the features of Windows Phone 8 to the older devices, it turns out that the sum total of its updates were the new resizable Live Tiles, some new theme colours and the ability to use Bing photo of the day images for the lock screen.

Good job Microsoft peeps, that must have taken a whole weekend to put together. Or did you get the interns to knock it together over a few lunchtimes?

There isn't even the relief of an update that works reliably. No, when kicking its former customers Microsoft missed no opportunity to extend the pain. Many users report that the new Live Tiles aren't... live, whilst both battery and Bluetooth performance have been compromised. I can confirm that these are exactly the problems I'm seeing on the Lumia too.

Its a real shame and  I can see how this will stop those owners affected ever purchasing a phone with Microsoft software again. The element of trust is broken and I suspect that those injured parties will be seeking the succour of Android or iOS at the soonest opportunity.

Which is a real shame, as Windows Phone 8 has an awful lot going for it. At least the dreadful sales numbers of WP7 devices mean that Microsoft have only upset a very limited number of users... talk about silver linings!


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…