Skip to main content

The Chromebook Pixel - Small Sales, Big Impact

Chromebooks are either a resounding success or a desperate failure, depending on who you listen too and what metrics you believe.

Some who have tried them have dismissed them as pointless and too reliant upon an available Internet connection. Others who have spent longer amounts of time rave a out them.

Samsung's and Acer's previous Chromebooks have played in the entry level laptop space - selling well (according to Amazon's figures anyway) by offering a laptop for less than the price of a laptop. The disadvantages of Chrome OS offset by the financial advantage.

So what are we to make of the Chromebook Pixel now that its been with us for a little while?

The Pixel has been torn apart for being ridiculously expensive, over species and packing all the disadvantages of the regular Chromebook.

That's completely missing the point.

Go to any Internet cafe, business meeting, developer conference and you'll see nothing but MacBooks. High end laptops that look great and cost a chunk more than your average machine.

People don't want to be seen to be using a low end machine where their reputation matters. This has been a problem for Chrome OS fans in the past. Pack your low spec machine and look bad in the eyes of your peers, or go with the MacBook instead.

The Pixel solves this dilemma. It's high end hardware is a match for anything that Apple has on the market, it's a curiosity which enhances your standing with your peers and it still runs the Chrome OS you love.

Google doesn't need to sell many. But every one it does sell erodes some of the apathy towards Chromebooks across the board.

A win all round.

And not at all an expensive machine in this context.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…