Skip to main content

Samsung's Multiple Device Strategy Is Brilliant, Even Though It Annoys You

Admit it, the announcement of the new Galaxy Mega has you hot under the collar. How could Samsung possibly feel the need to release another phone, with another screen size (two in fact!). Don't they realise that 75 different but almost the same smartphones is just too many?

Step back from your own personal angst though and you'll soon realise that Samsung's strategy is nothing short of brilliant. Here's why.

There's probably no more personal device than the smartphone - in fact we should really be taking the term personal computer and applying it right here. That lump that sits on your desk or occasionally travels in your briefcase isn't personal, not when compared to the device that's with you every waking minute and almost certainly every sleeping minute too.

Which is why the fan boy wars that we thought we left behind with Mac v Windows have been re-ignited at a much higher intensity. The smartphone has become such an important part of our everyday lives that we form an allegiance with it.


However, no one smartphone matches every single person's needs. And each person has a different part  of the smartphone feature set that is important to them.

Which is why articles and forum comments telling users they have the wrong smartphone are just nonsense. No two users have the same requirements, judging someone else's decision based on your criteria is both arrogant and inflammatory.

For every person who wants a phone that slips unobtrusively into their pocket there's another who wants a huge screen for games or video or browsing. For every user who demands a premium build and finish there's another (at least) who wants something of low value that can be lost or damaged with impunity. And for every slimline device customer there's one who values ruggedness above all. That's without considering cameras, methods of operation, software, apps or any of the other differentiators.

And Samsung has faced this market and decided it can't be like Apple - selling devices at a premium on its own terms. Rather it needs to deliver a device that competes for every single smartphone purchase. And by doing that it has created a myriad of devices at every possible market point to compete with everybody from Apple to ZTE.

99% of Samsung's smartphones will be of no use to you, whatever drives your purchase. But at the same time for 99% of buyers there'll be at least one Samsung phone that exactly meets their requirements.

Its much cleverer than a scattergun approach, its an incredibly focused niche approach and Samsung should be applauded for making it work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…