Skip to main content

Microsoft Attacks Google's Android - At The European Commission

Android is under attack from Microsoft. Not by the production of a super-hot Windows Phone or tablet, rather by accusations being made at the European Commission claiming unfair business practices. Allegations which don't stand up to even superficial scrutiny.

Microsoft has assembled a group of closely aligned Microsoft partners (Nokia, Expedia for example) and anti-Android litigators (Oracle) to petition the EU regarding Google's unfair competitive practices. To whit bundling its Android applications into a take it or leave it, all or nothing bundle for OEMs to apply to their devices.

The group, called Fairsearch, claims that Android's dominant position in the smartphone marketplace is being abused by Google to bolster their leading position in the search market.

Which is plainly nonsense. If anything Google's dominant position in the search market is driving the success of Android.



Irrespective of how the Fairsearch group paint it, even if Android were to enjoy 100% dominance in the market there is plenty of room for competition. Android is free to all comers, can be modified as desired and parts added and removed at will. Witness the Kindle Fire, Android based but without a hint of Google-ness about it.

Are there any parts of Google's portfolio that aren't available to OEMs as either standalone products or as part of competing suites? I don't think so. Nokia and Microsoft could easily take the Android platform and develop a phone running on it, package its own app store, Bing Search and Maps, Hotmail and Skype messaging and create a Microsoft 'Android' phone. Probably turn out to be an awful lot better than most Windows Phones to tell the truth.

Witness Apple's farce with Google products. Having ditched Google Maps for their own product, they were practically forced to beg for Google to launch a standalone version of Maps. Net result? Google Maps became the most popular app in the iTunes App Store. Similar stories are true of Chrome and Gmail apps. The lesson? People use Google products because they are the best of breed, not through any compulsion.

Fairsearch will get its day in court, but anything then a straight dismissal of the suit will amount to a complete travesty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.