Skip to main content

Just How Hot Should A Smartphone Run?

You can't help but have noticed how much hotter smartphones are running these days. If not from the unpleasant heat that's transferred to your hand when using it, then certainly the burning sensation that transfers to your leg when you shove one into your pants pocket.

Its rarely mentioned by reviewers when they look at a new phone but we all know it happens.

It was something that became quickly obvious was going to be an issue when I first tried Sony's latest high end device, the Xperia Z. The waterproofing that Sony have effected around the device also provides an additional barrier to ridding the device of heat and you'll find hotspots on the device where you'd probably best avoid holding it.


Its far from the worst offender I've come across. That honour goes to the HTC One X, which is just plain unpleasant to hold when doing anything strenuous to its quad core processor. I'm not exaggerating when I say that the One X too hot to hold on many occasions and needed to be set idle (or switched off) on a solid surface made of an appropriate material to act as a heat sink.

It's also a problem on the Galaxy Note 2 - although here the issue generally only surfaces when using GPS. The additional surface area and newer processor probably assist in lowering the overall temperature and its never gets beyond the uncomfortable.

In the quest to fit more and faster technology into slimmer and slimmer devices are manufacturers compromising thermal efficiency?

Its certainly not going to be doing great things for the usable life of these devices running this hot. Just something else for you to consider when next on the market for a new phone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…