Skip to main content

Facebook Home - Why You Might Not Care, But The World Will

Facebook launched Home for Android yesterday, however unless you live your life in Facebook its not very likely that it will be of much interest to you beyond the clever way of handling message notifications and overall design concept. That doesn't mean it can't be a success.

Android users fall into two camps - those who bought an Android phone for the flexibility and customisation capabilities. The other those just starting out with their first smartphone. The former group don't strike me as the target market for Home - I just can't see them giving up their widgets and flexibility for Facebook.

The second group will probably welcome Home as a much easier way to interact with their phones and Facebook. Of course as this group generally has lower spec phones it may be some time before Facebook Home becomes available to them.

Neither of these groups is really Facebook's target market. The real thrust of Facebook Home is at those people who don't have a phone yet, probably don't use Facebook and don't already have a preconceived notion of what a phone should be or do.

The modest specifications of the HTC First device that made its debut alongside Home yesterday points the way forward. Even the name is a big clue to its target. Facebook has been watching as millions of new users choose Android phones for their first device and enter the Android ecosystem - Google+ included.

Home, the First and all that will follow seeks to achieve to goals: firstly to try and get those new users straight into the Facebook network. And secondly to ease access to the sort of marketable information that Facebook sells to keep its business model turning.

Expect to see the rapid arrival of more low end phones running Home by default, possibly even with additional subsidies from Facebook.

For Facebook the product isn't Facebook or the phone, its the user. Yesterday's announcement was all about making that product easier to sell.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…