Skip to main content

Streaming Is The Future For Musicians, Maybe Not The Unpopular Ones Though

This NY Times has an article up today which suggests that music streaming services are going to drive musicians with small fanbases or niche styles out of the business because of the low rates that they pay.

Sorry, but the Times has that all wrong. Niche musicians are never going to be able to make a living based on music sales alone, doesn't matter where those sales are coming from, album sales, digital downloads or streaming services. Niche is niche because there isn't a huge audience. No audience = no sales, it really isn't rocket science.

The artist used to demonstrate the claim is an 'Avant Cellist' called Zoe Keating. Like me today is probably the first time you've heard the words avant and cellist used in the same sentence. Doesn't sound like a huge market does it? Zoe had 131,000 plays on Spotify this year - a reasonable number and if it translated into that many album purchases then the $0.5k she got paid by Spotify looks a little light. Thing is though, these streams don't equate to a music purchase in any way.

Here's my view of the streaming service, from an artist revenue point of view. A large percentage of tracks I stream on Spotify are ones I already own - either as CDs or purchased MP3s. They get dropped into playlists as the mood takes me. The next largest group of songs are from artists whose work I have already sampled on a small scale and I'm broadening my experience of their music to see whether I like their style or not. Perhaps one in ten of these actually end being the case. Finally there are artists whose work I have never listened to and am trying for the first time because of a recommendation - often from Spotify or - and around a one in twenty success rate applies here. These three groups probably break down to 40%, 40% and 20% of my listening on Spotify.

So from an artist's sales point of view absent the streaming service, 40% of the total streams can be discarded as being for music I already own, whilst the other 60% relates to music that I mostly wouldn't have bothered with without being able to try as a streaming file first. The real cost of sales to the artist then is actually the 5% of music I might have found through radio plays or other means and then gone on to buy.

In Ms. Keating's example this would amount around 6.5k additional track purchases - at around $0.07 per track (the artists royalty rate on track sales) - about $455, not a million miles away from what she got paid by Spotify.

What's really interesting is what happens when you multiply the number of streaming listeners by a factor of one hundred - the minimum likely growth pattern for these services over the next few years. Assuming that Ms. Keatings streams keep pace with this growth she could expect to garner a tidy $50k from Spotify streaming alone - not too shabby for a niche musician.

Streaming music is a real cash cow for artists, if they don't kill the golden goose with short-sightedness. Getting paid everytime someone listens to one of your tracks, for as long as the copyright exists is going to net significantly more money than a one time sale that lasts into perpetuity.

Its as easy as that.

Streaming Shakes Up Music Industry’s Model for Royalties -


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…